🔗 Share this article

When I am a game master, I historically steered clear of extensive use of randomization during my D&D games. I tended was for narrative flow and session development to be determined by player choice rather than random chance. However, I decided to alter my method, and I'm truly pleased with the outcome.

The Spark: Observing a Custom Mechanic

An influential streamed game showcases a DM who frequently calls for "chance rolls" from the participants. This involves selecting a specific dice and outlining potential outcomes contingent on the result. While it's fundamentally no different from using a random table, these are devised spontaneously when a character's decision doesn't have a clear conclusion.

I opted to test this technique at my own game, mainly because it looked novel and presented a departure from my normal practice. The experience were fantastic, prompting me to think deeply about the ongoing balance between planning and randomization in a D&D campaign.

A Powerful In-Game Example

During one session, my players had survived a city-wide fight. Afterwards, a cleric character inquired after two beloved NPCs—a brother and sister—had lived. Instead of deciding myself, I asked for a roll. I told the player to roll a d20. I defined the outcomes as: on a 1-4, both were killed; on a 5-9, a single one succumbed; on a 10+, they both lived.

The player rolled a 4. This triggered a incredibly moving moment where the party came upon the corpses of their allies, still united in death. The group held a ceremony, which was especially significant due to previous story developments. As a parting reward, I improvised that the forms were suddenly restored, containing a spell-storing object. By chance, the bead's contained spell was perfectly what the group required to solve another critical situation. You simply plan these kinds of magical coincidences.

Improving On-the-Spot Skills

This experience caused me to question if improvisation and thinking on your feet are truly the essence of tabletop RPGs. Even if you are a detail-oriented DM, your skill to pivot may atrophy. Groups reliably take delight in upending the most carefully laid narratives. Therefore, a good DM must be able to think quickly and invent scenarios in the moment.

Using luck rolls is a great way to practice these skills without straying too much outside your preparation. The key is to apply them for small-scale decisions that won't drastically alter the campaign's main plot. For instance, I would avoid using it to establish if the main villain is a traitor. Instead, I might use it to figure out whether the PCs arrive moments before a critical event unfolds.

Enhancing Shared Narrative

Luck rolls also helps keep players engaged and foster the impression that the game world is dynamic, evolving based on their choices in real-time. It prevents the sense that they are merely actors in a DM's sole narrative, thereby bolstering the cooperative aspect of storytelling.

This approach has long been integral to the original design. Original D&D were filled with charts, which fit a playstyle focused on exploration. Even though contemporary D&D frequently emphasizes narrative and role-play, leading many DMs to feel they must prep extensively, this isn't always the best approach.

Achieving the Sweet Spot

Absolutely nothing wrong with being prepared. However, it's also fine no issue with letting go and permitting the whim of chance to determine certain outcomes instead of you. Control is a major factor in a DM's role. We require it to run the game, yet we can be reluctant to give some up, at times when doing so can lead to great moments.

A piece of advice is this: Do not fear of letting go of control. Embrace a little randomness for minor outcomes. You might just find that the unexpected outcome is significantly more rewarding than anything you might have planned by yourself.